Chelsea Game at Stamford Bridge
Image by @cfcunofficial via flickr

What Liam Delap’s Injury Means for Chelsea This Season

After scoring 12 league goals for a struggling Ipswich side last season, Liam Delap attracted interest from several top clubs over the summer. Chelsea ultimately won the race, activating a £30m release clause in his contract, that had been reduced due to Ipswich’s relegation, and was a deal widely seen as a very shrewd piece of business.

Already a proven asset at this level, there was an expectation that the 22-year-old would immediately be a regular feature for Chelsea in the Premier League. This seemed to be Enzo Maresca’s plan as Delap featured in his new club’s opening three matches and was twice named in the starting XI.

During his third appearance, a home clash with Fulham, Delap was forced off with a hamstring injury just 14 minutes into the contest. The striker’s problem is serious enough that Chelsea will be without his services for around three months. Let us take a look at what impact this could have on the Blues this season.

Delap’s Expected Return

The early estimate for Delap’s return was 8 weeks, but Maresca has since upgraded this to 10-12 weeks. Taking the lower part of this range, a 10-week absence would see Delap back again in late November. It is important to remember that for absences of this length, players need extra time to regain match fitness. So, even when Delap is fit to play, he will likely have a game or two off the bench before he is considered for the starting 11.

While this is a serious injury, and a real blow for Delap, it could have been worse. Assuming there are no unexpected setbacks, he will be fully fit when the busy festive schedule arrives. Additionally, he managed to avoid requiring surgery, something which would have sidelined him for even longer.

Who Can Replace Delap?

When substituted against Fulham, Maresca responded by bringing on Tyrique George and moving Joao Pedro into the most advanced attacking position. Although Pedro is not the same type of forward as Delap, who is much more of a traditional number nine, he is perfectly adept at playing as a striker, rather than in a supporting role. Deploying the Brazilian to lead the line seems like it will be Maresca’s plan A moving forward, even if this requires some tactical tweaking.

The other option available to Maresca is to play Marc Guiu, who was recalled from his loan at Sunderland following Delap’s injury. Interestingly, there was no recall clause in the loan deal, but good relations between the two clubs saw them come to an agreement. This decision suggests there is some confidence at the Blues that Guiu can have a positive impact, despite making just three league appearances last season.

It would be easy to forget that David Datro Fofana is still at the club after his deadline day move to Charlton broke down. The Ivorian is not part of the Chelsea squad, though, and has been training away from the first team. Therefore, you can rule him out as being a possible Delap replacement. The same can also be said for brand new signing, Emanuel Emegha, who will only be joining the side in 2026.

So, Chelsea have Joao Pedro and Guiu as the most natural replacements, but Maresca also has the possibility of using an attacking midfielder in a false nine role. He has done this before with Pedro Neto, while Cole Palmer also has some experience deployed in the centre forward position. Whether this appeals is another question, but both men have a decent record when used in this way.

Rating Chelsea’s Attack Without Delap

As usual, Chelsea were busy during the transfer window, and one of their best bits of business was signing the very exciting Pedro from Brighton. The 23-year-old has hit the ground running at Stamford Bridge, scoring three times at the Club World Cup and twice in the Premier League (plus two assists). There seems to be no doubt he can lead the line for Chelsea, even if he would perhaps prefer to be playing just behind Delap.

The problem is that Chelsea face a long season with a lot of fixtures. Pedro can be involved regularly, but he is a Brazilian international, which means long flights during international breaks. September’s break saw him fly back from Bolivia, while Brazil have friendlies in SE Asia against Japan and South Korea in October. He has got a fairly good injury record, but there will be times that Maresca simply has to give the Brazilian a rest.

When Pedro is not available, this is when problems may arise. Guiu has shown little to suggest he is yet good enough to be a real goal threat in the Premier League. The fact that the 19-year-old managed just 13 minutes of league action during his short-lived stint at Sunderland helps reinforce this idea. Although he looked useful playing lesser-sides in the Conference League last season, it is hard to see the Spaniard being a trustworthy Delap alternative this season.

So, we expect to see Palmer or, more likely, Pedro Neto used centrally whenever Pedro needs a rest. Although this is not a bad short-term solution by any means, it is not ideal to move either player from their preferred position.

Should Chelsea Have Kept Jackson?

With Chelsea only having one dependable striker following Delap’s injury, could their decision to loan out Jackson come back to haunt them? Initially, it looked as though the Delap situation was going to block Jackson’s move. Reports spread that the club had trashed the deal, resulting in one unhappy Jackson and his defiant agent, who indicated his client would not be going back to England. However, the deal was revived when Chelsea negotiated the return of Guiu.

Although few would argue that Guiu is a better option than Jackson, it is clear the more experienced striker wanted out. Having already been on the brink of a move away, recalling him would have left Chelsea with one extremely unhappy player. The last thing managers want are unhappy players stinking up the dressing room. So, while progressing with the loan, especially given the generous €16m loan fee, was likely the right call, should Chelsea have signed a new striker on deadline day?

The club did look closely at Conrad Harder, but they had concerns about whether he could make an immediate impact. Chelsea were also concerned about agreeing a permanent deal, given it would hinder the development of Emanuel Emegha when he arrives in 2026. A loan move may have worked best in the circumstances, but finding someone suitable on such short notice was never going to be easy. So, while not moving late on for a striker appears to make sense, the Blues will need to keep their fingers crossed that Joao Pedro can avoid any serious injury for a few months and continue his fine start at Stamford Bridge.